I’ve only recently started using FaceBook.
I didn’t start using Twitter till 2010.
And the whole iPod / iTunes thing (that is – before the iPhone came out) was totally unknown to me. Those around me would look perplexed when I responded “Huh” to any conversation on this.
“Web 2.0” was alien to me (hell – what happened to 1.0?). “Gamification” sounded like something cute, and as far as I was concerned the “Cloud” was something that got in the way of the sun.
Image Source: stockunlimited.com
I felt that I was an “old fuddy-duddy”, a dinosaur, a relic from a simpler time (just to be melodramatic).
However, I knew that I had to come to terms with this new “fad”. If only to be able to talk with others in my field.
When I first started tweeting, I remember I was shocked when I got my first “follower” (“Who is this person? “How did they find me?”). It was also around this time that I started blogging. I wasn’t really sure why, but it was a way to “put down on paper” what my thoughts were regarding the technology I work with.
It always bothered me that I seemed to be always ‘lagging” behind. New things were coming out, and I was never an “Early Adopter”. Never on the cutting edge.
Then, I read Malcolm Gladwell’s book “What the Dog Saw”. Chapter 8 is titled “Late Bloomers”.
In it, he talks about creativity and describes some of the findings economist David Galeson had made in the world of art.
Of the famous artists, there were those who did their best work when they were young, who knew what they wanted to achieve (Picasso), and then there were those who didn’t do their best work till much later (Cezanne).
younger “prodigies” start with a clear idea of where they want to go, and then they execute it
On the other hand, the older Late Bloomer has imprecise goals and tend to “explore” in a tentative, and an incremental, way. And, for these artists, because the goal is imprecise, they never actually get to a point where they say. “Goal achieved!” They just keep exploring, testing and discovering along the way.
A Late Bloomer has imprecise goals and tend to “explore” in a tentative, and an incremental, way
This really struck me as interesting. It made me look at what I have been doing. As I mentioned above, I never started out with a goal when I started my blog. I never had an idea what I would be doing with Twitter.
But, looking back, I can see a journey of incremental discoveries.
The “subject matter” of my posts were, initially, to do with “document management in a regulated environment”. But as I did research on this, it has lead to other areas that, while not directly related, have a link with the initial concept.
And these have, in turn, taken me to other, loosely connected, areas of interest.
This “way of learning”, this “exploration”, is a good example of “naturalistic vs. mechanistic” learning.
It is my own passion, my own interest that is leading me on this journey.
And I get the feeling that it has given me a far better (may I say “wiser”) view of things, and how they can be used, and applied in real-life situations.